At 6'1, someone who is 6'-6'3 I usually perceive as my height, but 6' vs 6'3 is way different than 6'3 vs 6'6. 6'-6'3 is basically "normal" tall. Sure, a 3 inch gap is noticeable, but someone who is 6'6 is in another class of height. You're at the height where people start asking if you play basketball/want a picture Compared with Zhuang's group, the modified Zhuang's group had a shorter whole therapy duration [2.5 (IQR, 2.4-2.6) vs. 5.0 (IQR, 5.0-5.1) days, P<0.001] and a shorter hospital duration after operation [5 (IQR, 5-6) vs. 6 (IQR, 5-6) days, P=0.013] (Table 5), which was more time saving F-stops only refer to the size of the aperture. Unlike stops of exposure, they don't simply double or halve, but instead, depend on the f ratio. For example, going from f/2.8 to f/2 is one stop up. (Remember, a smaller f-number means a larger aperture!) Going from f/5.6 to f/8 is one full stop down. ok s4415910 it does make sense. the points this person put under answer is what YOU have to put in and if you do a little work you could see it is the smallest trapizoid. and if you can't see that then you shouldn't be in whatever class you're in now because it seems to be you can comprehend the simplest math. now, have a wonderful day. Honestly, I don't understand when guys above 5'6 complain about being short. You people have an average height in most countries - or just below average and you have a larger pool of girls to approach to. most of these guys that are 5'7 or taller aren't actually 5'7 or taller. they're probably just 5'4 guys claiming to be 5'7 or whatever. In In my opinion, 5'7-6'0 is average ish height. 6'2 and beyond is what I consider tall, and 5'6 and below is what I consider short. I'm 6'0 tall, and im shorter than plenty of guys, or just on par. I dont feel like im fucking hulking over any mass of people. .

5 6 vs 6 0